Stabilization of Lactobacillus reuteri by encapsulation of bacterial cells through spray drying

 
crossMark
 
doi: 10.18081/2333-5106/015-07/432-443
American Journal of BioMedicine Volume 3, Issue 7, pages 432-443
Published: July 29, 2015


Gabriela Sinkiewicz-Enggren, Amanda Skurzynska, Tove Sandberg 

Abstract

Micro-organisms are often located within surface-associated multicellular aggregates known as biofilms. The human gastrointestinal tract (GI-tract) carries a microbiota that is constantly affected by extraneous influences, and hence upholding and improving the microbial balance has increased the request for probiotics. Several Lactobacillus reuteri strains have probiotic properties and are used in food technology. In this study the growth characteristics of L. reuteri was investigated using the morphology and stability of L. reuteri ATCC PTA 5289 after encapsulation through spray drying. The bacterial cells were assessed and visualized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Light Microscopy (LM) as well as spectrophotometry. L. reuteri ATCC PTA 5289 showed stable growth on polystyrene surfaces and adherence was also observed on aluminum surfaces. SEM images demonstrated morphological changes of the bacteria that occurred during the spray drying. After spray drying the preparation showed 15 % viable cells. The survival percentage of the spray-dried end product after 4 weeks of storage was approximately 33 % when stored at 5 °C, compared to 5 % at 25 °C.

Keywords: Bacterial survival; Encapsulation; L. reuteri; ATCC PTA 5289; Scanning electron microscope; Spray drying 

ReferencesFull-Text/PDFFeedback

References

1. Hentschel U, Dobrindt U, Steinert M. Commensal bacteria make a difference. Trends in Microbiology 2003;1(4):148-150. [PubMed]

2. NIH Guide, Research on microbial biofilms. PA number: 2002; PA-03-047.

3. Branda SS, Vik Å, Friedman L, Kolter R. Biofilms: the matrix revisited. TRENDS in Microbiology 2005;13:20-26. [PubMed]

4. Bauman RW. Microbiology, alternate edition with diseases by body system. Pearson Education, USA 2006; 408.

5. Macfarlane S, Dillon J F. Microbial biofilms in the human gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2007;13:5064-5072. [PubMed]

6. Madhwani T, McBain A J. Bacteriological effect of Lactobaciluus reuteri probiotic on in vitro oral biofilms. Elsevier, archives og oral biology 2011;56:1264-1273.

7. Ofek I, Hasty DL, Doyle RJ. Bacterial Adhesion to Animal Cells and Tissues. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, United States of America 2003;165-166.

8. Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM. Microbial BioFilms. Annual review of Microbiology 1995;49:711-45. [PubMed]

9. Stewart PS, Franklin MP. Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2008;6(3):199-210. [PubMed]

10. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections. Science AAAS 1999; 284:1318-1322. [PubMed]

11. Boone DR, Castenholz RW, Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT. Bergey’s manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Springer Inc., United States of America 2008;2:1208-1213.

12. Ofek I, Hasty DL, and Doyle RJ. Bacterial Adhesion to Animal Cells and Tissues. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, United States of America 2003:178 + 191.

13. Talarico TL, Casas IA, Chung TC, Dobrogosz WJ. Production and isolation of reuterin, a growth inhibitor produced by Lactobacillus reuteri. Antimicrobial Agents Chemotherapy 1988; 32(12):1854–1858. [PubMed]

14. Plackett D. Biopolymers – New Materials for Sustainable Films and Coatings, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2011: 44-45.

15. Hammes WP, Hertel C. The Genera Lactobacillus and Carnobacterium. Prokaryotes 2006;4:320-403.

16. Romano A, Blaiotta G, Di Cerbo A, Coppola R, Masi P, Aponte M. Spray-dried chestnut extract containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus cells as novel ingredient for a probiotic chestnut mousse. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2014;116:1632-1641.

17. Casas I, Dobrogosz WJ. Validation of the probiotic concept: Lactobacillus reuteri confers broad-spectrum protection against disease in humans and animals. Microb Ecol Health Dis 2000;12:247-285.

18. Jantzen M, Göpel A, Beermann C. Direct spray drying and microencapsulation of probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri from slurry fermentation with whey. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2013;115:1029-1036.

19. Desmond C, Ross RP, O´Callaghan E, Fitzgerald G, Stanton C. Improved survival of Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338 in spray-dried powders containing gum acacia. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2002;93:1003-1011.

20. Muthukumarasamy P, Allan-Wojtas P, Holley AR. Stability of Lactobacillus reuteri in different types of microcapsules. Journal of food science 2006;71:20-24.

21. Chanramoili V, Kailasapathy K, Peiris P, Jones M. An improved method of microencapsulation and its evaluation to protect Lactobacillus spp. in simulated gastric conditions. Journal of Microbiological Methods 2004;56:27-35.

22. Bauman RW. Microbiology, alternate edition with diseases by body system. Pearson Education, USA 2006: 739.

This article is freely available to the wider public with permitted reusery under the option of open access publication.

Full-Text/PDF

Thank you for visiting American Journal of BioMedicine.  * = Required fields

[gravityform id=”6″ name=”Feedback”]