Systemic failures in septic shock patients/main biomarkers

crossMark

Received March 13, 2017; Accepted June 08, 2017; Published July 22, 2017
http://dx.doi.org/10.18081/2333-5106/015-05/206-219

Noémi da Silva, Daniel Kopper, Sevgi González-Hernández

Abstract

 Sepsis is commonly defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by an uncontrolled deleterious host response to infection. Septic shock is defined as a subset of sepsis in which there is profound circulatory, cellular, and metabolic abnormalities that are associated with a greater risk of mortality than with sepsis alone. Mortality varies for both definitions of sepsis, being 20-30% for sepsis, while for septic shock, this figure can shoot up to between 30% and 50%. Hemodynamic, kidney, lung, sinus, cardiovascular or liver abnormalities are the paramount reasons why these patients are hospitalized. Septic shock can develop immediately soon after hospital admission, but many cases develop it after some time, therefore causing patients to return to hospital treatments once they have already recovered. Therefore, it is crucial to know the markers that could predict and help identify the patients at risk of developing septic shock but also the ones who will develop systemic failures. With this review, we aimed to pool time reliable and cost-effective biomarkers. SIRS criteria, upon their discovery and publication, were a hope to generate a uniform prospective multicentric trial, but SIRS with its 4 criteria is too unspecific and insensitive sign in order to stratify patients. In this study, we aim to review the most important biological markers of organ function that is responsible for systemic failures in patients with septic shock. The early-stage mortal septic shock does not involve laboratory findings. The emergence of morphofunctional abnormalities does not appear abruptly.

Keywords: Severe sepsis; Systemic failure; Inflammation; Biomarkers


 

References

1. Cortez MA, Bueso-Ramos C, Ferdin J, Lopez-Berestein G, Sood AK, Calin GA. MicroRNAs in body fluids—the mix of hormones and biomarkers. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2011;8(8):467–77. [PubMed]

2. Bravo AA, Kumm K, Lamy C, et al. H2 therapy protects myocardial cell injury induce by sepsis via attenuated expression the level of HMGB1. Pathphysiology of Cell Injury Journal 2012;1:10-19. [Abstract/Full-Text]

3. Wang K, Zhang S, Marzolf B, Troisch P, Brightman A, Hu Z, et al. Circulating microRNAs, potential biomarkers for drug-induced liver injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106(11):4402–7. [PubMed]

4. Reid G, Kirschner MB, van Zandwijk N. Circulating microRNAs: Association with disease and potential use as biomarkers. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2011;80(2):193–208.

5. Slade E, Tamber PS, Vincent JL. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: raising awareness to reduce mortality. Crit Care 2003;7:1–2. [PubMed]

6. Pierrakos C, Vincent JL. Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Crit Care 2010;14:R15. [PubMed]

7. Bakker J, Coffernils M, Leon M, Gris P, Vincent JL. Blood lactate levels are superior to oxygen-derived variables in predicting outcome in human septic shock. Chest 1991;99:956–62. [PubMed]

8. Holmes CL, Russell JA, Walley KR. Genetic polymorphisms in sepsis and septic shock: role in prognosis and potential for therapy. Chest 2003;124:1103–15. [PubMed]

9. Izquierdo-Garcia JL, Nin N, Ruiz-Cabello J, et al. A metabolomic approach for diagnosis of experimental sepsis. Intensive Care Med 2011;37:2023–32. [PubMed]

10. Mickiewicz B, Duggan GE, Winston BW, Doig C, Kubes P, Vogel HJ. Metabolic profiling of serum samples by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a potential diagnostic approach for septic shock. Crit Care Med 2014;42:1140–9. [PubMed]

11. Lvovschi V, Arnaud L, Parizot C, et al. Cytokine profiles in sepsis have limited relevance for stratifying patients in the emergency department: a prospective observational study. PLoS One 2011;6:e28870. [PubMed]

12. Saric J, Li JV, Swann JR, Utzinger J, et al. Integrated cytokine and metabolic analysis of pathological responses to parasite exposure in rodents. J Proteome Res 2010;9:2255–64. [PubMed]

13. Nicholson JK, Foxall PJ, Spraul M, Farrant RD, Lindon JC. 750 MHz 1H and 1H-13C NMR spectroscopy of human blood plasma. Anal Chem 1995;67:793–811. [PubMed]

14. Ding M, Smeal, Orlicky S, PUmezawa C, Lee Y, Umezawa CH. Cellular injury by over expression of Pin1/up-regulation in autoimmune disease. Pathphysiology of Cell Injury Journal 2013;2:12-23. [Abstract/Full-Text]

15. Yousif NG. Fibronectin promotes migration and invasion of ovarian cancer cells through up-regulation of FAK-PI3K/Akt pathway. Cell Biol Int 2014;38(1):85-91. [PubMed]

16. van den Berg RA, Hoefsloot HC, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AK, van der Werf MJ. Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genomics 2006;7:142. [PubMed]

17. Trygg J, Wold S. Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O-PLS). J Chemometrics 2002;16:119–28.Trygg J, Wold S. Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O-PLS). J Chemometrics 2002;16:119–28. [Cross Ref]

18. Cerra FB, Caprioli J, Siegel JH, McMenamy RR, Border JR. Proline metabolism in sepsis, cirrhosis and general surgery. The peripheral energy deficit. Ann Surg 1979;190:577–86.

19. Mao H, Wang H, Wang B, Liu X, Gao H, Xu M, et al. Systemic metabolic changes of traumatic critically ill patients revealed by an NMR-based metabonomic approach. J Proteome Res 2009;8:5423–30. [PubMed]

20. Punyadeera C, Schneider EM, Schaffer D, et al. A biomarker panel to discriminate between systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis and sepsis severity. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2010;3:26–35. [PubMed]