Estimated glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine in Brazil/changing in CKD

crossMark

Page 282-293
doi: 10.18081/2333-5106/015-06/325-332
Received June 20, 2017; Accepted September 27, 2017; Published October 22, 2017

Brazil is a country with a significant burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Renal failure is rarely diagnosed in developed countries as a result of available clinical and laboratory development, as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) can be easily and cheaply estimated by a simple equation based on serum levels of creatinine. This approach allows CKD to be diagnosed earlier, prevents harmful medications in renal patients, and suggests medication adjustments to avoid nosocomial effects. The objective of this study is assessing the performance of validated GFR estimating equations in Brazil and its consequences for the diagnosis and prognosis of CKD. To diagnose the degree of renal function, the main equation used in Brazil is the one developed by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), which allows simultaneous assessment of GFR, serum creatinine, and eGFR, which are used in relation to cardiovascular events and mortality. As opposed to the white confirmed equation, CKD-EPI did not show a lower relationship with calciuria, albuminuria, proteinuria, and mortality. Additionally, CKD-EPI does not show diagnostic accuracy for detecting the degree of renal failure in the TC-CD, hemocessation, and the fat accumulation as AR. Despite this, CKD-EPI has a lower diagnostic success for awareness of GFR < 90 ml/min/1.73m2. This may be one of the reasons for the relatively increased prevalence of hemorrhagic hematocrit and malignancies in patients with CKD.

Keywords: Chronic kidney disease (CKD); Glomerular filtration rate (GFR);Renal function; Serum creatinine

References

1. Stevens LA, Padala S, Levey AS. Advances in glomerular filtration rate-estimating equations. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2010;19:298-307. [PubMed]

2. Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: A position statement from Kidney Disease. Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Kidney Int 2005;67(6):2089–100. [PubMed]

3. Sarnak MJ, Levey AS, Schoolwerth AC, et al. Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: a statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention. Hypertension 2003;42(5):1050–65. [PubMed]

4. Coresh J, Astor B, Sarnak M. Evidence for increased cardiovascular disease risk in patients with chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2004;13(1):73–81. [PubMed]

5. Kwong YT, Stevens LA, Selvin E, et al. Imprecision of urinary iothalamate clearance as a gold-standard measure of GFR decreases the diagnostic accuracy of kidney function estimating equations. Am J Kidney Dis 2010;56:39-49. [PubMed]

6. Stevens LA, Coresh J, Greene T, Levey AS. Assessing kidney function — measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2473-2483. [PubMed]

7. Myers GL, Miller WG, Coresh J, et al. Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement: a report from the Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program. Clin Chem 2006;52(1):5–18. [PubMed]

8. Mathew TH. Chronic kidney disease and automatic reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate: a position statement. Med J Aust 2005;183(3):138–41. [PubMed]

9. Coresh J, Stevens LA, Levey AS. Chronic kidney disease is common: what do we do next?Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23(4):1122–5. [PubMed]

10. Eckardt KU, Berns JS, Rocco MV, et al. Definition and classification of CKD: the debate should be about patient prognosis–a position statement from KDOQI and KDIGO. Am J Kidney Dis 2009;53(6):915–20. [PubMed]

11. Fontsere N, Bonal J, Salinas I, et al. Is the new Mayo Clinic Quadratic equation useful for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in type 2 diabetic patients? Diabetes Care  2008;31(12):2265–7. [PubMed]

12. Grubb A, Nyman U, Bjork J, et al. Simple cystatin C-based prediction equations for glomerular filtration rate compared with the modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation for adults and the Schwartz and the Counahan-Barratt prediction equations for children. Clin Chem 2005;51(8):1420–31. [PubMed]

13. Larsson A, Malm J, Grubb A, et al. Calculation of glomerular filtration rate expressed in mL/min from plasma cystatin C values in mg/min. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2004;64(1):25–30. [PubMed]

14. Coresh J. CKD prognosis: beyond the traditional outcomes. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;54(1):1–3. [PubMed]

15. Stevens LA, Levey AS. Use of the MDRD study equation to estimate kidney function for drug dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86(5):465–7. [PubMed]

16. Melloni C, Peterson ED, Chen AY, et al. Cockcroft-Gault versus modification of diet in renal disease: importance of glomerular filtration rate formula for classification of chronic kidney disease in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51(10):991–6. [PubMed]

17. Wargo KA, Eiland EH, 3rd, Hamm W, et al. Comparison of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations for antimicrobial dosage adjustments. Ann Pharmacother 2006;40(7–8):1248–53. [PubMed]

18. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Impaired Renal Function Study Design, Data Analysis, and Impact on Dosing and Labeling. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Rockville:1998.

19. Stevens LA, Levey AS. Impact of reporting estimated glomerular filtration rate: it’s not just about us. Kidney Int 2009;76(3):245–7. [PubMed]

20. Xie D, Joffe M, Brunelli S, et al. A comparison of change in measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with nondiabetic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:1332–1338. [PubMed]

21. Grubb A, Bjork J, Lindstrom V, et al. A cystatin C-based formula without anthropometric variables estimates glomerular filtration rate better than creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2005; 65(2):153–62. [PubMed]

22. Knight EL, Verhave JC, Spiegelman D, et al. Factors influencing serum cystatin C levels other than renal function and the impact on renal function measurement. Kidney Int 2004;65(4):1416–21. [PubMed]