Evaluation of medical teaching skills in undergraduate medical school: a cross-sectional questionnaire study

Research Article  
American Journal of BioMedicine Volume 4, Issue 5, pages 103-108
Received December 03, 20115; accepted April 12, 2016; published May 05, 2016

Badr Dahham Badr, Ahmed Hasan Raheem, Nasser Ghaly Yousif*¹ mail of corresponding author


Many medical schools have searched for ways to effectively and constructively evaluate performances of their faculty members and it is paramount to ascertain their effective by continuous evaluation and development of all teaching staff. The objective of this study are: to inform the allocation of medical school resources; to identify parts where teaching system can be updated; support methods for promotion by teachers; and to provide feedback and encouragement for teachers. A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted from January, 2015 to June, 2015 and descriptive statistics were used to analyze the evaluation ratings, the effects of evaluation, the satisfaction of students in elective courses, and the attendance of students in elective courses. There is a growing commitment in teaching methodology to undergraduate medical students, but there are challenges faced faculty members are mainly attributed to lack of professional training on how to developed standard curriculum that addresses the teaching methodology aspects and there is a need to train teaching members as ‘training of trainers’ on how to teach medical students, regardless their previous scientific certification.

Keywords: Teaching methodology; Professional training; Teaching evaluation

Copyright © 2016 by The American Society for BioMedicine and BM-Publisher, Inc.



1. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Researchs. University application Guide for Students. Iraq-Baghdad, 2015.

2. Hilfy TY. Quality and Accreditation in Health Professions Education in Iraq – Accreditation in Health Professions Education. Middle east Journal of Family Medicine 2007;5:3-7. [Abstract/Full-Text]

3. AOME. Standards for Medical Educators. Academy of Medical Educators 2015;12:4.

4. Asai A, Kishino M, Fukui T, Masano T. Postgraduate education in medical ethics in Japan. Med Educ 1997;32:100-4. [Abstract/Full-Text]

5. UCL. Quality Assurance Unit. UCL Medical School. 2015;12:4.

6. Jagsi R, Lehmann LS. Learning in Practice. The ethics of medical education BMJ 2004;329:332-4. [Abstract/Full-Text] 

7. Goldie J, Schwartz L, Morrison J. Process evaluation of medical ethics education in the first year of a new medical curriculum. Med Educ 2000;34:468-73. [Abstract/Full-Text] 

8. Mattick K, Bligh J. Teaching and assessing medical ethics: where are we now? J Med Ethics 2006,32:181-185. [Abstract/Full-Text]

9. Pinazar V, Margolis S. Western medical ethics taught to junior medical students can cross cultural and linguistic boundaries. BMC Med Ethics 2004;5:4. [Abstract/Full-Text]

10. McCullough MT. A skills-based approach to teach clinical ethics. Acad Med 2009;84:154. [Abstract/Full-Text]

11. Ahmed K, El Bagir M. What is happening to bedside clinical teaching? Med Educ 2002;36:1185-1188. [Abstract/Full-Text]

12. Foundation, Education Training. Professional Standards for Teachers and Trainers in Education and Training – England. Education Training Foundation 2015;12:4.

13. Sharma A, Nundy S. Rules for medical practice. Indian J Med Ethics 2002;10:3.

14. Cribb A, Bignold S. Towards the reflexive medical school: the hidden curriculum and medical education research. Stud Higher Educ 1999;24:195-209.

15. General Medical Council. Tomorrow’s doctors: recommendations on undergraduate medical education London: GMC, 2002.

16. General Medical Council. Tomorrow’s doctors: recommendations on undergraduate medical education London: GMC, 1993.

17. El-Bagir KA. What is happening to bedside clinical teaching? Medical Education 2002;36(12):1185-1188. [Abstract/Full-Text]

18. Reiser SJ. The ethics of learning and teaching medicine. Acad Med 1994;69:872-76. [Abstract/Full-Text]

19. van der Vleuten C. Validity of final examinations in undergraduate medical training. BMJ 2000;321:1217-19. [Abstract/Full-Text]

20. Mansfield F. Supervised role-play in the teaching of the process of consultation. Med Educ 1991;25:485-90. [Abstract/Full-Text]


limited access

1. Access this article through your login credentials or your institution

Get Access

2. Purchase this article at rate $55.00 and received Full-Text/PDF
You will have online immediate access to article following the completion of this purchase and you may download and print a copy of each article for your personal use. Use the coding below to purchase your article as PDF by credit card, debit card, PayPal will be asked to supply your billing card information. Before continue with your purchase please read carefully the AJBM terms and conditions of purchase.

Purchase Article

For any technique error please contact us and will be response to sending purchase article by email.

Thank you for visiting American Journal of BioMedicine.  * = Required fields

[gravityform id=”6″ name=”Feedback”]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email